While important to note why this is so common, it is more important to realize all Git pulls follow the general format: git pull, regardless of any particular naming convention. Some Git workflows eliminate these naming conventions altogether, favoring terms like dev, staging, and production, as you see in the repo used in examples on this page. There is no requirement to have either a remote called origin or a branch called main. You can read more about why “main” is the current default here. In some older docs and repositories you might see this labeled as the master branch, making the command Git pull origin master, it has become standard to rename it to main. Just as origin is the default remote name, ‘main’ is the current industry standard for what to call the main working branch. For a lot of repositories, there is only ever one remote set, so origin is the most popular remote name. Why is the Git pull origin main command so common in examples? The first remote you add for a local repository is named origin by default in Git. One of the most common examples of performing a Git pull uses the command: How do you perform an interactive rebase?.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |